首页 体育内容详情
彩客网(www.99cx.vip)_Judge delays decision on Latif corruption charges

彩客网(www.99cx.vip)_Judge delays decision on Latif corruption charges

分类:体育

网址:

SEO查询: 爱站网 站长工具

点击直达

彩客网www.99cx.vip)是一个开放皇冠体育网址代理APP下载、皇冠体育网址会员APP下载、皇冠体育网址线路APP下载、皇冠体育网址登录APP下载的官方平台。彩客网上彩客分析专家数据更新最快。彩客网开放皇冠官方会员注册、皇冠官方代理开户等业务。

,

THE Sessions Court in Johor Baru today postponed decision on the case against former Johor executive councillor Abd Latif Bandi, his son, and a real estate consultant, who are facing 37 charges of corruption and money laundering over RM35.7 million.

Judge Kamarudin Kamsun, who was scheduled to deliver the verdict today, said there were still some arguments that needed to be submitted by parties involved and he would then rule on August 7.

“I need to listen to those arguments before making a decision. So, I can’t do it today, hence, a new date will be set,” he said.

Lawyer Salehuddin Saidin, represented Latif, 56, and his son, Ahmad Fauzan Hatim, 30, then applied for the court to hear the submission by the defence.

During the proceedings, the court heard submissions by the prosecution, represented by Deputy Director I, legal and prosecution division of the Malaysian Anti -Corruption Commission (MACC) Wan Shaharuddin Wan Ladin, and assisted by deputy public prosecutors Ahmad Akram Gharib and Mahadi Abdul Jumaat.

On June 14, 2017, Latif, Ahmad Fauzan and Amir Shariffuddin Abd Raub, 49, were charged with 33 counts of corruption and four counts of money laundering for a total of RM35.7 million, and they pleaded not guilty to all charges.

On April 21, 2019, Kamarudin acquitted and discharged the three of them of the 37 charges after finding the prosecution having failed to prove its case.

However, on November 7, 2021, the High Court ordered the former chairman of the state housing and local government committee and his co-defendants to enter their defence, after it overturned the Sessions Court verdict.

On the corruption charges, the three men are charged under section 28 (1) (C) of the MACC Act 2009, read together with section 16 (a) (B) of the same act.

They were also charged under section 32 (8) (c) and section 89 of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti -Terrorism Financing and Proceeds from Unlawful Activities (AMLA) Act 2001. – Bernama, June 26, 2022.


转载说明:本文转载自Sunbet。
  • 皇冠app(www.hg108.vip) @回复Ta

    2022-07-10 00:00:49 

    截至2021年前三季度,皇氏集团净利润1800万元,同比下滑45.62%,扣非后净利润-2321.85万元,同比下滑4006.88%。催更来的加一

发布评论